Get 18% off your first order - use WELCOME25 discount code now!
NURS-6501 week 1 discussion – sore throat essay
NURS-6501 week 1 discussion – sore throat essay
NURS-6501 Module 1, week1 discussion. Topic: Discussion: Alterations in Cellular Processes
Alterations of cellular responses are caused by multiple changes occurring within the cell in response to environmental stressors. When signals sent by the signaling molecules are received by the target cell, the normal cellular response is the end of the line. However, diseases cause alterations of cellular responses resulting in abnormal changes in the normal response processes and is often caused by…
ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
A 16-year-old boy comes to the clinic with a chief complaint of a sore throat for 3 days. Denies fever or chills. PMH negative for recurrent colds, influenza, ear infections, or pneumonia. NKDA or food allergies. Physical exam reveals a temp of 99.6 F, a pulse of 78, and regular respirations of 18. HEENT normal with exception of the reddened posterior pharynx with white exudate on tonsils that are enlarged to 3+. Positive anterior and posterior cervical adenopathy. A rapid strep test performed in the office was positive. His HCP wrote a prescription for amoxicillin 500 mg PO q 12 hours x 10 days disp #20. He took the first capsule when he got home and immediately complained of swelling of his tongue and lips, and difficulty breathing with audible wheezing. 911 was called and he was taken to the hospital, where he received emergency treatment for his allergic reaction. NURS-6501 week 1 discussion – sore throat essay.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post an explanation of the disease highlighted in the scenario you were provided. Include the following in your explanation:
•The role genetics plays in the disease.
•Why the patient is presenting with the specific symptoms described.
•The physiologic response to the stimulus presented in the scenario and why you think this response occurred.
•The cells that are involved in this process.
•How another characteristic (e.g., gender, genetics) would change your response.
Use three scholarly peer-review articles not later than FIVE YEARS eg 2015 to 2020 in writing this NURS-6501 week 1 discussion – sore throat essay paper.
Resources
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXSuEIMrPQk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz0wx1-jTds
McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.
file:///C:/Users/obyok/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/Downloads/Pathophysiology-%20The%20Biologic%20Basis%20for%20Disease%20in%20Adults%20and%20Children%20%20(1).pdf
Use this textbook and the YouTube videos and three scholarly peer-reviewed articles related to cell and immunity and disease to write this 2-page discussion. The articles must be from 2015 to 2020. Cite in APA format. The link following the textbook is the E version of the textbook. NURS-6501 week 1 discussion – sore throat essay.
Rubric Detail
Name: NURS_6501_Discussion_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. NURS-6501 week 1 discussion – sore throat essay Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by Day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A NURS-6501 week 1 discussion – sore throat essay |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post main post by Day 3. |
||
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered if posed. The response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
The response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. The response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
The response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed. The response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. NURS-6501 week 1 discussion – sore throat essay |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
A response may not be on-topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. The response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed. The response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
The response may not be on-topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
| NURS-6501 week 1 discussion – sore throat essay | ||||||
Name: NURS_6501_Discussion_Rubric
NURS-6501 Module 1, week1 discussion. Topic: Discussion: Alterations in Cellular Processes
Solution
Multiple changes occurring within the cell response to external stresses are responsible for cellular response modifications. The typical cellular response occurs when the target cell receives the signals delivered by the signaling molecules. However, diseases create variations of cellular responses that result in aberrant changes to the normal response processes. These abnormal changes are frequently the result of infections and manifest as signs and symptoms. This paper explores a case study of a 16-year-old kid who presents to the clinic with various symptoms and a three-day history of sore throat as his major complaint. Nonetheless, he develops a severe adverse reaction after receiving 500 mg of amoxicillin. Consequently, this assignment explores the function of heredity, the appearance of specific symptoms, and the effect of age.
Function of genetics
Recurrent sore throat is persistent among youngsters. It is caused by Streptococcus group A bacteria and is frequently heritable. Variations in the HLA area are associated with the recurrent nature of sore throat (Chauhan et al., 2016). These unique mutations of the gene are related to the immune system’s response to infections and are detectable through genetic testing. As a result, the patient’s susceptibility to sore throat increases due to the genetic modifications generating variances. Notably, inadequate antibody responses against Spe A bacteria are associated with immunologic and genetic variables (Chauhan et al., 2016). This presents a barrier to identifying the Streptococcus group A bacterium component. Sore throat essay for NURS-6501 week 1 discussion
Why the patient manifests particular symptoms
Diseases are characterized by the emergence of signs and symptoms resulting from the disruption of normal cellular responses. For instance, the invasion of Streptococcus group A bacteria into the body results in pus discharge, reddening, and throat inflammation. Thus, clinical symptoms are linked to the colonization of the pharynx by fibronectin-binding proteins of Streptococcus pyogenes (Soderholm, Barnett, Sweet & Walker, 2018). On the other hand, the patient’s symptoms following administration of the first 500 mg capsule of amoxicillin are due to an allergic reaction to antibiotics. Antibiotics frequently cause severe nausea and vomiting, disorientation, swollen lips and cheeks, rapid heart rate, shortness of breath, wheezing, and shock.
Physiological reaction and process-involved cells
This patient’s physiologic responses include a reddish posterior pharynx with white exudate on tonsils 3+ in size. Also detected are anterior and posterior cervical lymphadenopathy. The quick strep test revealed the presence of Streptococcus group A germs in the patient. Adaptive and innate reactions are responsible for physiologic responses because they produce a defense mechanism to combat the infection. Inducing and maintaining host responses are PGE2 and leukotriene B4 (LTB4), chemokines, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), eicosanoids, and proinflammatory cytokines, among other compounds produced by cellular mediators. This category of cells consists of epithelial cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells. Sore throat essay for NURS-6501 week 1 discussion
How the age variable would affect the response
Age impacts the likelihood of developing diseases. This indicates that certain diseases are more prevalent among young people, while others are more prevalent among the old. In youngsters between the ages of 5 and 15, sore throat has increased. According to Campbell et al. (2018), adults have a 5 to 10 percent chance of sore throat infection regardless of an already robust immune system. The pharmacological treatment of individuals with sore throats should be guided by the patient’s age to prevent unpleasant reactions and allergies.